| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

The mystery of the two Susannah Julia Phillips

Page history last edited by Elaine Phillips 5 years, 11 months ago

According to the records there are two children with the name Susanna(h) Julia Phillips who were born in 1854 at Holborn to (1) Eliza Phillips (2) Charles and Emma Phillips respectively. We do not know if these are separate individuals or whether the records are not telling us the whole story, and that these are in fact the same person.

 

[1] Susanna Julia Phillips

Born approximately 1854 in Holborn, Middlesex (estimated from the age given in the 1861 census[1]) .

Baptised March 27th 1859 at Holy Trinity, Dartford. The parents were recorded as Eliza Phillips (no father’s name given) and the residence is given as Union House, Dartford[2].

1861: Dartford Union Workhouse.

 

[2] Susannah Julia Phillips

Born on 21st April 1854 at the Lying in Hospital, Endell Street, Holborn, London[3]

The parents were named as Charles Phillips, a Blacksmith, and Emma Phillips formerly Farrier[4]. The birth was registered on 1st May 1854 by E Phillips, the mother, of 3 Bartlett’s Passage, Fetter Lane in Holborn (Registration District of St Giles in the Fields & St George Bloomsbury, Sub-district of South St Giles in the Fields).

 

The Lying in Hospital
'The hospital was established in 1749 in Brown St. 100 years later it moved to Endell Street. It catered for the 'distressed poor (married women only) with special attention to the wives of soldiers and sailors'. There was provision both for in and out care i.e. assistance was given with home deliveries, though most of the patients were provided with a bed in the hospital. It was supported by private subscription. The hospital was regulated by 13 George III c.82.'[5]


'The Holborn Lying In Hospital was established for respectable but somewhat impoverished married couples, who were in London (usually on a temporary basis) and had not adequate home facilities for the birth of a child. The patients had to be recommended by one of the patrons of the hospital.'[6]

 

The registers of patient particulars for the Lying in Hospital have survived and are now held by the National Archives. The entry[7] that corresponds with the birth of Susannah Julia Phillips[8] gives the following detail:-

 

No.   39467
Day of order of admission 1854 March 16th
Woman & Husbands Name Phillips Emma wife of Charles
Occupation Blacksmith
Age  21
Place of Marriage  St Johns, Waterloo
Reckoning[9]   March
Came in  20th April
Delivered  21st April

Child Born: Alive

                 Dead

Girl

-

Died Since  -
Character of Labour  Natural
Discharged or Died & Cause  13th May
Recommender  Thomas Stilwell[10]

 

There are a number of possible theories to explain what has happened, which are outlined below:

 

Theory 1

Susannah  is Charles and Emma’s daughter (as the birth certificate states) but she is passed off later in life as Eliza’s daughter.

 

The patient registers from the hospital would suggest that the information entered on the birth certificate is correct, not least because Emma’s admission to hospital required the support of a ‘recommender’ who could vouch for her.

 

It is possible that Charles and Emma decided not to risk the life of their young child[11] on a voyage that would take over 100 days – particularly if the child was sickly (their daughter Ellen Emma Phillips died in 1854 and this may have influenced their decision). At the same time, Charles and Emma would not have qualified for assisted passage to emigrate if it was known that they were leaving behind a daughter of this age.

 

Nevertheless, there would have been considerable practical difficulties for Eliza in looking after her sister-in-law’s newborn baby in an age where options such as bottle-feeding were a long way from being safely established.

 

Theory 2

Susannah is Eliza’s daughter but is passed off as the daughter of Charles and Emma when the birth was registered.

 

Eliza would not have been eligible for admission to the hospital (as she was not married) but perhaps, the family decided that she needed the care of the hospital for the birth of her child and passed her off as Emma to get her admitted.

 

However, the deception would need to have been carried out for quite some time and involve people outside the family (such as the recommender who supported the mother’s admission to the hospital).

 

It is worth noting that registrations of births and deaths in New South Wales record the number of children born to Charles and Emma Phillips and these numbers do not support the theory that Susannah Julia is their daughter.

 

Theory 3

There were two girls named Susannah Julia Phillips born in Holborn in 1854 and they are entirely separate individuals (as well as being cousins).

 

If this is the case then (1) the birth of Eliza’s daughter was not registered (though the births of her other children were registered) (2) the death of Charles’ daughter was not registered (Charles and Emma emigrated by themselves). At such an early date in the history of civil registration it was not uncommon for births and deaths to go unregistered.

 

Conclusion

Weighing up the evidence from the birth certificate, register of patient admissions and the 1861 census entry (which shows Eliza Phillips in Dartford Union Workhouse with her daughter, Susannah Julia Phillips, who was born around 1854) it seems highly likely that there was only one Susannah Julia Phillips.

 

Although the early documentary evidence supports the theory that Susannah was the daughter of Charles and Emma Phillips the practicalities of looking after a new born baby (as well as the fact that the child survived) would tend to support the theory that Susannah was Eliza’s daughter. However, the only certainty is that no definite conclusion can be reached from this distance to the actual events!

 

Susannah Julia Phillips (1854-1910)

 

The registers and census records show that there is one Susannah Phillips alive in the following decades, which would appear to be the child living with Eliza in Dartford Union Workhouse in 1861.

 

Although Susannah states her place of birth in all the records after 1861 as Dartford, Kent we know that no birth was registered for a Susannah Julia Phillips in Dartford. As Susannah spent almost all her childhood in Dartford it is perhaps unsurprising that she gives this as her place of birth (she may not even have been aware of the Holborn connection).

 

1861: Dartford Union Workhouse[12]

Susan (7)  is in the workhouse and is listed as a scholar. The record shows that she was born in Holborn, Middlesex. Susan is living with Eliza (30), a calico print worker; her brother William (13), a scholar; and her sister Eliza (3), an infant. The rest of the family have Dartford, Kent listed as their place of birth.

 

1871: 23 Waterside, Dartford, Kent[13]

Susan Phillips (16) is an unmarried servant to the family of Alfred Wolfe. Susan’s occupation is given as general servant domestic and her place of birth is recorded as Dartford, Kent.

 

1881: 114 Hythe Road, Dartford, Kent[14]

Susan Phillips (23) is an unmarried mill hand and her place of birth is recorded as Dartford, Kent. At this time she was a boarder with Thomas and Mary Shepherd. A few doors away, at 108 Hythe Road, is Edward Cuckow (31) an unmarried gas laborer stoker.

 

Susannah Phillips married Edward Cuckow in the Parish Church at Orpington by Banns on April 23rd 1882[15]. Edward Cuckow, a bachelor of full age, was working as a labourer at the time of their marriage. 

 

In the marriage certificate Susannah Phillips, a spinster of full age, names her father as John Phillips – Labourer. This would seem to rule her out as Eliza’s daughter, except that it was commonplace for illegitimate children to provide a fictitious name or to name an uncle on marriage. It is possible that this has happened in this instance.

 

The witnesses to the marriage were Alfred Smith and Eliza Smith. This couple appear in the 1881 census living in Albert Road, Orpington[16]. Alfred (32) was a worker in the paper mill while his wife Eliza (23) was a rag cutter in the paper mill. At the time of the census they had two children – George (5) and Eliza (2). All were born in Orpington except Eliza (23) who was born in Dartford, Kent. Eliza’s maiden name was Phillips and the combination of her age and place of birth makes it likely that she is the daughter of Eliza Phillips and the sister of Susannah Julia Phillips – a theory which is further supported by the appearance of Susannah as the witness at Eliza’s wedding.

 

1891: Gas House, 17 Gas Lane, Dartford, Kent[17]

Edward F. Cuckow (41), Foreman at the Gas works, and his wife Susannah Cuckow (37) were living with their children: Amy Dyson Cuckow (8); Edward Cuckow (6); Arthur R. Cuckow (4) and Lilian (1). The entire family were born in Dartford, Kent.

 

1901: 17 Gas Lane, Dartford, Kent[18]

Edward Cuckow (51), Foreman (Gas Works), and his wife Susan Cuckow (47) were living with their children: Amy Cuckow (18)[19]; Edward Cuckow (16), a private in the Vol. Medical Staff Corps.; Arthur (14), an Engineers Shop Hand; and Grace (5).

 

Susannah Julia Cuckow died on 7th January 1910[20] from Phthisis Pulmonis (tuberculosis)[21] and she was buried at Brent Cemetery, Dartford on 12th January 1910[22].

 

Edward Frederick Cuckow died on February 5th 1914[23] and he was buried at Brent Cemetery, Dartford on 10th February 1914[24].

 

 

 

Footnotes

  1. Source: 1861 Census
  2. Source: Parish Registers, Dartford. Susanna and Eliza were baptised on the same day (Eliza's entry in the register is no. 1364 and Susanna's entry in the register is no. 1365). No father's name is given, nor any occupation listed for the father.
  3. Source: Birth Certificate.
  4. The name "Farrier" is a mis-spelling of Emma's correct name "Ferrier"
  5. Source: http://yourarchives.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php?title=The_British_Lying_in_Hospital%2C_Holborn
  6. Source: http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/LONDON/1998-10/0909400463
  7. Entry 39467 in Particulars of Patients in the British Lying in Hospital 1819-1868, Volume 11 (TNA Reference RG 8/61).
  8. The register records the details of patients not the child. The name of the child born is not stated in the entry, although we can match this up by date using the detail from Susannah's birth certificate.
  9. The date when the baby was due.
  10. There is a Thomas Stilwell in the registration district of St Clement Danes who is a navy agent at the time of the 1841 and 1851 census, who later becomes a local commissioner of income tax (as recorded in the 1861 census).
  11. Susannah Julia would have been about 7 months old at the start of the voyage.
  12. Source: 1861 Census (RG 9/467)
  13. Source: 1871 Census (RG 10/885)
  14. Source: 1881 Census (RG11/866; Folio 39; Page Number 27).
  15. Source: Marriage Certificate, GRO Index Reference - Bromley (June Quarter, 1882) Volume 2a, Page 647. Edward's father was named as William Cuckow - Labourer. Both parties were resident in Orpington at the time of their marriage.
  16. Source: 1881 Census (RG11/0859 Folio 94 Page 26).
  17. Source: 1891 Census (RG 12/640).
  18. Source: 1901 Census (RG 13/703).
  19. An occupation is given but is hard to read.
  20. Source: Burial Registers, Brent Cemetery and GRO Index Reference - Dartford (March Quarter, 1910) Volume 2a, page 376. The index entry states that Susannah Julia was 54 years old when she died. Certificate not ordered.
  21. Source: Death Certificate. The certificate shows that Susannah Julia Cuckow died on 7th January 1910 from Phthisis Pulmonis at Gas House, Victoria Road, Dartford aged 54 Years. Under occupation the certificate states that she was the wife of Edward Frederick Cuckow - a Works Foreman at Gas Works. The informant (when the death was registered on 8th January 1910) was Edward William Cuckow, Son in attendance who was living at 7 Westgate Road, Dartford.
  22. Source: Burial Registers, Brent Cemetery - Entry 9932. The register states that Susannah (54) was the wife of Edward Cuckow of Gas House, Victoria Road, Dartford - Foreman at the Gas Works. The death occurred at Gas House. Susannah was buried in a purchased grave (number A1058) in the extension ground at Brent Cemetery (also known as East Hill Cemetery).
  23. Source: Burial Registers, Brent Cemetery and GRO Index Reference - Dartford (March Quarter, 1914) Volume2a, page 834. The index entry states that Edward was 64 years old when he died. Certificate not ordered.
  24. Source: Burial Registers, Brent Cemetery - Entry 10946. The register states that Edward (64) lived at Gas Works Cottage, Victoria Road, Dartford and that he worked as a Gas Works Foreman. The death occurred at Gas Works Cottage. Edward was buried in a purchased grave (number A1058) in the extension ground at Brent Cemetery (also known as East Hill Cemetery).

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.